Share |

Why Circumcision is Unnecessary, with John Travis, MD

Then we have another whole issue of, as I've said it's a procedure in search of a disease. And all of the diseases that it's been purported to cure, from masturbation to epilepsy to schizophrenia, to urinary tract infections, or cancer of the cervix... cancer of the penis. None of them have held up to scientific scrutiny.
...
The latest one is HIV/AIDS in Africa. There were three studies done that were highly biased, seriously flawed, and they purport to show a 60% reduction in transmission from females to males. It actually is greater from males to females, but that hasn't been talked about. But the studies are so confounded with other variables, they were stopped early, just a lot of things that were done. There was big money behind them. They were clearly on a mission to bring circumcision to Africa.
...
If you just look at the simple numbers... Europe is largely uncircumcised, has a low HIV rate. The U.S. is largely circumcised, has a high HIV rate. How hard can it be to see there ain't no correlation?
...
At the same time they're fighting female circumcision, they're promoting male circumcision. Which, while they're very different on the outside, if it's done to an infant, it seems like a minor procedure, as opposed to a young girl having her clitoris either dehooded or removed.